Nonlinear lap joint interface modeling and updating strategies for assembled structures

Document Type: Full Length Article

Authors

Center of Excellence in Experimental Solid Mechanics and Dynamics, School of Mechanical Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Narmak, Tehran 16844, Iran

10.22064/tava.2020.127915.1168

Abstract

A comparison between two known strategies of modeling lap joint interfaces, namely, zero-thickness and thin layer interface theories and their associated updating procedures, is made. Finite element models capable of accurately representing nonlinear behavior of assembled structures with localized nonlinearities in their bolted lap joint are developed. A practical strategy is employed in updating of these structures that initially parameters describing linear behavior are updated based on the low-amplitude excitation experimental observations. In the next step, parameters representing nonlinear effects are updated using stepped-sine excitations near the structure resonance frequency. In both steps, the Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) algorithm is used to reduce the discrepancies between experimental observations and model predictions. The identified contact interface models are validated by comparing their predictions with the experimental data not included in the updating procedure. In what concerns the updating process, the convergence rate of parameter identification in a model with zero thickness frictional contact elements was lower and more time-consuming compared to the model with thin layer interfaces.This study shows assigning appropriate material properties for the thin interface layer results in contact forces with comparable accuracy to the ones obtained by zero thickness elements with less computational efforts.

Highlights

  • Zero-thickness and thin layer elements are used to model contact nonlinearities.
  •  Accuracy of the two methods are compared using an experimental case study.
  • A thin layer interface virtual material with smooth constitutive law is found accurate.
  • No penalty methods are required in thin layers to distinguish stick and slip states.
  •  Employing thin layers reduce the computations in obtaining responses

Keywords

Main Subjects


[1] M.A. Beaudoin, K. Behdinan, Analytical lump model for the nonlinear dynamic response of bolted flanges in aero-engine casings, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 115 (2019) 14-28.

[2] H. Festjens, G. Chevallier, J.L. Dion, Nonlinear model order reduction of jointed structures for dynamic analysis, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 333 (2014) 2100-2113.

[3] C. Stocchi, P. Robinson, S.T. Pinho, A detailed finite element investigation of composite bolted joints with countersunk fasteners, Composites Part A: applied science and manufacturing, 52 (2013) 143-150.

[4] H. Jalali, H.H. Khodaparast, M.I. Friswell, The effect of preload and surface roughness quality on linear joint model parameters, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 447 (2019) 186-204.

[5] S. Daouk, F. Louf, C. Cluzel, O. Dorival, L. Champaney, S. Audebert, Study of the dynamic behavior of a bolted joint under heavy loadings, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 392 (2017) 307-324.

[6] M. Eriten, M. Kurt, G. Luo, D.M. McFarland, L.A. Bergman, A.F. Vakakis, Nonlinear system identification of frictional effects in a beam with a bolted joint connection, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 39 (2013) 245-264.

[7] C. Ehrlich, A. Schmidt, L. Gaul, Reduced thin-layer elements for modeling the nonlinear transfer behavior of bolted joints of automotive engine structures, Archive of Applied Mechanics, 86 (2016) 59-64.

[8] C. Ehrlich, A. Schmidt, L. Gaul, Microslip joint damping prediction using thin-layer elements, in:  Dynamics of Coupled Structures, Volume 1, Springer, 2014, pp. 239-244.

[9] M. Iranzad, H. Ahmadian, Identification of nonlinear bolted lap joint models, Computers & Structures, 96 (2012) 1-8.

[10] H. Jalali, A. Hedayati, H. Ahmadian, Modelling mechanical interfaces experiencing micro-slip/slap, Inverse Problems in Science and Engineering, 19 (2011) 751-764.

[11] M.M. Alamdari, J. Li, B. Samali, H. Ahmadian, A. Naghavi, Nonlinear joint model updating in assembled structures, Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 140 (2014) 04014042.

[12] B.J. Deaner, M.S. Allen, M.J. Starr, D.J. Segalman, H. Sumali, Application of viscous and Iwan modal damping models to experimental measurements from bolted structures, Journal of Vibration and Acoustics, 137 (2015).

[13] R.M. Lacayo, B.J. Deaner, M.S. Allen, A numerical study on the limitations of modal Iwan models for impulsive excitations, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 390 (2017) 118-140.

[14] R.M. Lacayo, M.S. Allen, Updating structural models containing nonlinear Iwan joints using quasi-static modal analysis, Mechanical systems and signal processing, 118 (2019) 133-157.

[15] J. Abad, F.J. Medel, J.M. Franco, Determination of Valanis model parameters in a bolted lap joint: Experimental and numerical analyses of frictional dissipation, International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 89 (2014) 289-298.

[16] D.J. Segalman, Modelling joint friction in structural dynamics, Structural Control and Health Monitoring: The Official Journal of the International Association for Structural Control and Monitoring and of the European Association for the Control of Structures, 13 (2006) 430-453.

[17] E.J. Berger, Friction modeling for dynamic system simulation, Appl. Mech. Rev., 55 (2002) 535-577.

[18] H. Ahmadian, H. Jalali, Generic element formulation for modelling bolted lap joints, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 21 (2007) 2318-2334.

[19] M.J. Mashayekhi, J. Kövecses, A comparative study between the augmented Lagrangian method and the complementarity approach for modeling the contact problem, Multibody System Dynamics, 40 (2017) 327-345.

[20] G. Stadler, Path-following and augmented Lagrangian methods for contact problems in linear elasticity, Journal of computational and applied mathematics, 203 (2007) 533-547.

[21] S. Stupkiewicz, J. Lengiewicz, J. Korelc, Sensitivity analysis for frictional contact problems in the augmented Lagrangian formulation, Computer methods in applied mechanics and engineering, 199 (2010) 2165-2176.

[22] R. Lacayo, L. Pesaresi, J. Groß, D. Fochler, J. Armand, L. Salles, C. Schwingshackl, M.S. Allen, M. Brake, Nonlinear modeling of structures with bolted joints: a comparison of two approaches based on a time-domain and frequency-domain solver, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 114 (2019) 413-438.

[23] M. Sanati, Y. Terashima, E. Shamoto, S.S. Park, Development of a new method for joint damping identification in a bolted lap joint, Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 32 (2018) 1975-1983.

[24] Z. Qin, D. Cui, S. Yan, F. Chu, Application of 2D finite element model for nonlinear dynamic analysis of clamp band joint, Journal of Vibration and Control, 23 (2017) 1480-1494.

[25] J. Abad, J.M. Franco, R. Celorrio, L. Lezáun, Design of experiments and energy dissipation analysis for a contact mechanics 3D model of frictional bolted lap joints, Advances in Engineering Software, 45 (2012) 42-53.

[26] E. Pennestrì, V. Rossi, P. Salvini, P.P. Valentini, Review and comparison of dry friction force models, Nonlinear dynamics, 83 (2016) 1785-1801.

[27] C.S. Desai, M.M. Zaman, J.G. Lightner, H.J. Siriwardane, Thin‐layer element for interfaces and joints, International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 8 (1984) 19-43.

[28] G.N. Pande, K.G. Sharma, On joint/interface elements and associated problems of numerical ill‐conditioning, International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 3 (1979) 293-300.

[29] M.H. Mayer, L. Gaul, Segment-to-segment contact elements for modelling joint interfaces in finite element analysis, Mechanical systems and signal processing, 21 (2007) 724-734.

[30] S. Panda, N.P. Padhy, Comparison of particle swarm optimization and genetic algorithm for FACTS-based controller design, Applied soft computing, 8 (2008) 1418-1427.